Trial to begin for woman who used holistic medicine to treat fatally ill son

They have alleged Lovett chose to treat the bacterial infection with homeopathic herbal remedies instead of taking her son to a doctor.

“In the short term, these cases may polarize the debate and lead to a further entrenchment for the true believers,” said Tim Caulfield, research director of the University of Alberta’s Health Law and Science Policy Group.

“However, over the long term, I am hopeful they will help the broader public debate.”

Police say there’s no record of the boy ever being taken to a doctor for annual checkups or any treatment.

Investigators say the woman’s friends were worried about the child’s health and urged her to take him to a physician.

“The cases are a very dramatic and sad statement that we should not put personal beliefs about pseudo-science over the interests and welfare of children,” said Caulfield.

It’s not the first time in 2016 the issue of natural medicine and the death of a child have been before the courts. In April, David and Collet Stephan were found guilty by a jury in Lethbridge, Alta., of failing to provide the necessaries of life for their 19-month-old son Ezekiel.

The couple treated Ezekiel with smoothies containing hot peppers, onions and horseradish when he became ill. He died of bacterial meningitis in hospital. A number of people, including a nurse who was a family friend, recommended the parents take Ezekiel to a doctor.

The Stephans, who are appealing, argued their conviction set a dangerous precedent in Canada, because if “we do not fall in line with parenting as seen fit by the government, we all stand in risk of criminal prosecution.”

University of Calgary bioethicist Juliet Guichon said the law should go one step further and hold friends and family members accountable in a child’s death.

“The legal system requires citizens to alert child welfare that a child is in danger. Citizens just have to call 911 and they can do so anonymously,” she said.

“Perhaps the police will find evidence that someone had reasonable and probable grounds to believe that the child was in need of intervention and yet did not report this information. If so, then will charges be laid against that person for failing to report the child needed help?”

— Follow @BillGraveland on Twitter

Bill Graveland, The Canadian Press

by Canadian Press

Trial to begin for woman who used holistic medicine to treat fatally ill son

What's Trending