The 2025-2026 budget includes tax savings for families and low-income earners, and record-high investments in health care and education, though those increases come alongside record population growth. (Roman Hayter/980 CJME)

By CJME

Budget Reaction

‘Dumpster fire’: Sask. provincial budget draws mixed reactions

Mar 20, 2025 | 9:32 AM

The provincial government unveiled its 2025-26 budget Wednesday afternoon, drawing mixed reactions from interest groups.

While the budget includes tax savings for families and investments into health care and education, some are saying the government funding in their sectors isn’t high enough.

Saskatchewan Teachers’ Federation

The province has budgeted $3.5 billion for the Ministry of Education, a 5.5 per cent increase from last year. That includes $130 million for the new teacher bargaining agreement and to address classroom complexity.

Samantha Becotte, president of the Saskatchewan Teachers’ Federation, said the increase is a step in the right direction, but questioned whether the increase is enough.

SJHL Playoffs

North Stars fall short of comeback in Game 1 against Weyburn

12h ago

PROVINCIAL BUDGET

Jeremy Cockrill talks new budget impacts on the Battlefords and area

20h ago

Ban on Booze

More than 50 U.S. alcohol brands will soon vanish from Sask. shelves

22h ago

“You never get everything you want out of a budget, whether it’s personal or provincial, but we want to make sure that students are supported in their schools,” Becotte said.

The union head said she wants to see Saskatchewan back in first place when it comes to per-student funding.

“We’ve seen some catch-up in terms of those numbers over the last couple of years, we’re still about $1,800 per student behind on where we were when we were first in the country,” Becotte said.

Saskatchewan School Boards Association

Shawn Davidson, president of the Saskatchewan School Boards Association, said this year’s education budget is reasonable.

He said investment falls short, but was pleased the province recognizes the financial pressure on Saskatchewan’s 27 school boards.

“The operating side falls a little bit short of investment that would allow divisions to invest in a bunch of additional supports for students,” he said.

“But we are pleased that it has recognized our key cost drivers and divisions should be able to, in their local context, make some decisions that are maybe a little easier than they have in some of the last few years.”

Shawn Davidson said the government has recognized the key cost drivers that school divisions are facing. (Nicole Garn/CJME)

Health-care union

Despite the Ministry of Health’s budget for the fiscal year adding up to a record $8.1 billion, is an increase of 6.4 per cent over the previous budget, a health-care union leader said staffing issues weren’t adequately addressed.

Linda Renkas, vice president of CUPE Local 5430, said there’s nothing in the budget for health-care workers.

“We hear a lot of talk about recruitment, a lot of talk about infrastructure, yet what are we going to do with this infrastructure when we can’t currently staff the facilities that are operational right now?” Renkas asked.

Linda Renkas said health-care workers are going to be “very upset” with this budget. (Nicole Garn/CJME)

She cited the Urgent Care Centre in Regina, which still isn’t open 24 hours a day, and said she feels like the government is getting ahead of itself when it comes to promises of new facilities.

The health budget includes funding for new urgent care centres in Moose Jaw, Prince Albert and North Battleford, along with money for additional urgent care centres in both Regina and Saskatoon.

“Obviously we want to see services in our rural (areas). We want to see services provided to the citizens of the province, but there has to be a meaningful plan on how to staff it,” she said.

“I would have liked to see more (money) to recruitment, more money put towards the workers that are in the trenches right now.”

Renkas said a focus on retention and keeping workers in Saskatchewan was completely left out of the budget.

“It’s a dumpster fire,” Renkas said.

Canadian Taxpayers Federation

Gage Haubrich, prairie director for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, was sounding the alarm about Saskatchewan’s growing debt after the budget was tabled.

“I think the most important number for taxpayers to know in this budget is $2.4 billion, because that’s how much more the government is adding to the debt, saddling taxpayers with the costs of and increasing their costs and hurting them down the line,” he explained.

Gage Haubrich of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation raised concerns about the province’s debt levels. (Nicole Garn/CJME)

Premier Scott Moe ran his last election campaign on affordability, but Haubrich said the added debt is going to cost taxpayers.

“We’re seeing almost a billion dollars in interest payments coming from that increase in debt,” he said.

“The government said they want to improve affordability, but you can’t improve affordability when you’re settling the cost of debt onto taxpayers like this.”

‘Tremendous position of strength’: Moe defends spring budget

Premier Scott Moe talks about the impracticality of a contingency fund ahead of the spring budget being released. Mar. 19, 2025. (File photo)

Premier Scott Moe started off Wednesday by touting his government’s choices in the spring budget.

“Although (tariff) challenges are in no way diminished, as they are the most significant economic challenges that we have faced for some period of time, we are not walking away from the commitments that we made to Saskatchewan people,” said Moe.

He explained his government included funding for its commitments made in the fall election in the budget, as well as commitments made in the Speech from the Throne, because he said it’s what his party heard were the priorities of the people in the province – education, health care, community safety and affordability.

Moe also gave more reasons on top of the finance minister’s, as to why no contingency fund was included in the budget numbers.

“Why would you, at the outset of a budget, just (borrow) money, pay interest on that money and have it sitting there in case you need it,” said Moe.

He also asked what amount it should have been.

“We’ve seen varying amounts across the nation, which tells you nobody quite knows what the impact of the tariffs might be, and we don’t even know what that might look like even in the near term – you don’t know how long they’ll be, what rate they’ll be at and whether or not they’ll even be implemented,” he said.

Moe wasn’t saying there wouldn’t have to be investments and supports if the tariff situation were prolonged, but he said that would be something the province would work out with the federal government.

He said supporting these at-risk industries should be done in more innovative ways, pointing to an announcement made the day before the budget about SaskPower and SaskEnergy choosing to source products from Evraz Steel in Regina, which has been affected by the U.S. steel and aluminum tariff.

The budget was presented as balanced, with a $12 million surplus, which Moe said would be a good thing for the tariff uncertainty ahead.

“This puts our province in, I think, a tremendous position of strength, relative to any other province across Canada today,” said Moe, remarking that he hadn’t seen any other provinces with balanced budgets so far.

When asked how reliable that number could be, without tariffs taken into account, Moe said there’s variability and risk in every provincial budget – this year there’s just additional risk.

—