By Canadian Press

Meng’s extradition to U.S. far from slam dunk, say lawyers, experts

Feb 4, 2019 | 1:19 PM

WASHINGTON — Canada’s former ambassador to China might have committed an unforgivable diplomatic gaffe when he sized up the case against Meng Wanzhou, but that doesn’t mean his assessment was wrong.

So say legal experts who have examined the public details of the case against Huawei’s chief financial officer, who is free on bail in Vancouver and facing extradition to the U.S. to answer to bank fraud, wire fraud and conspiracy charges.

Ambassador John McCallum lost his job last month after publicly detailing reasons he believed Meng has a strong case to make in fighting the extradition order.

Henry Chang, a Toronto-based immigration lawyer who specializes in cross-border issues, says the political overtones — President Donald Trump has publicly expressed a willingness to intervene — will allow Meng to argue the charges are politically motivated, and the extradition request an abuse of process.

Shootout Loss

North Stars walk away with one point in weekend series against Yorkton

Nov 10, 2024

Missing man

Battlefords RCMP issues update on missing man

Nov 09, 2024

LEST WE FORGET

'They fought for our freedom': N.B. paints commemorative crosswalks ahead of Remembrance Day

Nov 08, 2024

In an analysis to be released later today, Chang also says because the alleged crimes occurred outside North America, there’s a chance Justice Minister David Lametti could refuse to surrender Meng on the grounds that neither Canada nor the U.S. has jurisdiction.

Wesley Wark, a University of Ottawa professor and national-security specialist, says he believes the case against Meng is weak, especially when compared with other similar extradition cases involving Canada over the years.

The Canadian Press